Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Sustainable Energy Development

Penentuan Nilai Porositas pada Sample Berea di Routine Core Analysis Laboratorium BBPMGB “LEMIGAS” Febriyana, Marine Chyntya; Welayaturromadhona
Journal of Sustainable Energy Development Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Sustainable Energy Development (JSED)
Publisher : Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jsed.v2i1.756

Abstract

This study aims to analyze routine cores, especially for determining the porosity of a rock.  The samples tested by the coreval tool were 3 samples of 1.5 inch diameter with a length of 4.5 cm each. The sample used is a sample of Berea sandstone.  When the core sample comes, it is continued with ct-scan and spectral gamma ray. The next process is washing the fluid in the core sample. After cleaning from other fluids, the core sample will be dried in the oven. After it is completely dry, the sample must be stored in a desiccator containing silica gel. After ambient temperature, then the core sample is tested using Coreval 700.  The data inputted into the coreval computer are the name of the core sample, the dry weight of the core, the length of the core, and the diameter of the core. The coreval tool takes readings of bulk volume, pore volume, and porosity. This reading resulted in bulk volume values of 50.091 cc; 53.446 cc; and 52.410 cc, respectively. The pore volume value of each sample is 12.091 cc; 13.787 cc; and 13.385 cc. As for porosity, the value of each sample is 25.767%; 25.795%; and 25.540%. Keywords: coreval 700; permeability; porosity, RCAL
EVALUASI KINERJA HEAT EXCHANGER 260E-103 PADA KILANG LUBE OIL COMPLEX III UNIT 260 PT KILANG PERTAMINA INTERNASIONAL RU IV CILACAP Villia Rian Ashari; welayaturromadhona, welayaturromadhona
Journal of Sustainable Energy Development Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Sustainable Energy Development (JSED)
Publisher : Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jsed.v2i2.1364

Abstract

In the process of processing petroleum, PT Pertamina International RU IV Cilacap is equipped with a heat exchanger asa supporting tool for the production and processing. Heat exchanger functions as a heat exchange that works with theprinciple of heat exchange without mass transfer. The use of heat exchangers that are in extreme environments and areused for a long period of time to pass fluids, there is a high probability of deposit formation or impurities that can affectthe pressure drop and decrease the performance efficiency of the heat exchanger in terms of heat exchange. Planning forcleaning must be considered to maintain the performance of the heat exchanger performance so that it remains in optimalcondition. The heat exchanger that will be evaluated in this study is Heat Exchanger 260E-103 at PT PertaminaInternational RU IV Cilacap. The research was conducted using quantitative methods through the calculation of foulingfactor, pressure drop, and heat transfer efficiency. The results showed that the Rd value of Heat Exchanger 260E-103 ofLMO was 0.0317 hr ft2 oF/Btu; 0.0058 hr ft2 oF/Btu; 0.0048 hr ft2 oF/Btu, MMO was 0.0193 hr ft2 oF/Btu; 0.0157 hr ft2oF/Btu; 0.0070 hr ft2 oF/Btu, and DAO of 0.0153 hr ft2 oF/Btu; 0.0193 hr ft2 oF/Btu; 0.0029 hr ft2 oF/Btu. The pressuredrop value of Heat Exchanger 260E-103 of LMO is 12.021 Psi; 10.632 Psi; 10.416 Psi, MMO is 11.077 Psi; 11.108 Psi;10.435 Psi, and DAO is 14.149 Psi; 13.764 Psi; 13.625 Psi. The efficiency for Heat Exchanger 260E-103 of LMO is22.81%; 79.47%; 82.16%, MMO is 29.07%; 46.03%; 72.16%, and DAO is 17.43%; 60.06%; 45.04%. The results showthat Heat Exchanger 260E-103 is not suitable for use because it has Rd and pressure drop values exceeding normallimits, and efficiency is below standard.
Estimasi Cadangan Lapangan RTD Menggunakan Metode Decline Curve Analysis Dan Log WC Vs Np Maulana, Nadhif; Abror, Hadziqul; welayaturromadhona
Journal of Sustainable Energy Development Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Sustainable Energy Development (JSED)
Publisher : Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Lapangan RTD dibor pada tahun 1984 dengan sumur RTD-1 dan terus berproduksi sejak saat itu. Hingga tahun 2020, total sumur yang dibor di lapangan sebanyak 20 sumur, 13 diantaranya masih berproduksi dan 6 sumur digunakan untuk injeksi air. Lapangan RTD terdiri dari 3 reservoir yaitu Holland Greensand, De Lier Sandstone, dan Ijsselmonde Sandstone. Ketiga reservoir Rotterdam menghasilkan minyak, air dan sejumlah kecil gas. Reservoir Batupasir IJsselmonde telah berproduksi sejak tahun 1984, Reservoir Batupasir De Lier telah berproduksi sejak tahun 1986 dan Reservoir Holland Greensand telah berproduksi sejak tahun 1988. Penelitian ini membahas tentang evaluasi cadangan pada lapangan RTD dengan melakukan perhitungan cadangan. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode Decline Curve Analysis dan metode Log WC vs Np. Perhitungan akan dikelompokkan menjadi 2 yaitu seluruh lapangan RTD dengan menggunakan kedua metode dan yang kedua yaitu menggunakan metode Log WC vs Np pada masing-masing lapisan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah study literatur yang berhubungan dengan perhitungan cadangan pada lapangan RTD yaitu dengan mengumpulkan informasi data sekunder mengenai data – data untuk forecasting dalam bentuk buku – buku literatur, jurnal, dan tugas akhir yang berkaitan dengan judul peneliti. Lapangan RTD memiliki total STOOIP 319 MMSTB dari 3 reservoir dan masing-masing reservoir memiliki watercut 56% - 82%. Perhitungan cadangan Lapangan RTD mendapatkan hasil RR 8,71 MMSTB dengan EUR 67,52 MMSTB, dan memperoleh hasil RR 8,25 MMSTB dengan EUR 67,05 MMSTB. Hasil masing-masing lapisan di lapangan RTD bila ditotal mendapatkan hasil RR 6,62 MMSTB dengan EUR 65,43 MMSTB.
Desain Hydraulic Fracturing Sebagai upaya Peningkatan Produktivitas Sumur X Lapangan Y Berliana Dewi, Salsabila; Abror, Hadziqul; welayaturromadhona, welayaturromadhona
Journal of Sustainable Energy Development Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Sustainable Energy Development (JSED)
Publisher : Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The decline in oil production due to aging wells and formation damage has become a critical challenge in the petroleum industry. This study focuses on the design of hydraulic fracturing to improve Well X's productivity in the Telisa Formation, Central Sumatra Basin. The research utilized FracCADE 7.0 software to simulate hydraulic fracturing scenarios and optimize fracture geometry and conductivity. The parameters investigated included variations in fracturing fluid volume, proppant types, and injection methods, culminating in 12 simulation scenarios. The geomechanical analysis revealed that the Telisa Formation, dominated by low Young’s modulus (<3×10⁶ psi) and low Poisson’s ratio, is favorable for fracturing, as it tends to generate wider fractures at lower pumping pressures. However, higher Young's modulus layers at greater depths showed the potential for longer but narrower fractures, albeit requiring higher pumping pressures. These characteristics guided the selection of fracturing intervals and operational parameters to optimize stimulation results. The results showed that the optimal scenario utilized 32,239 gallons of fracturing fluid, Brady Sand as the proppant, and the Proppant Concentration Step-Wise Increasing (PCSI) injection method. This configuration produced fractures with a half-length of 171 ft, width of 0.149 inches, height of 253.3 ft, and fracture conductivity of 13,592 mD.ft, resulting in a Fold of Increase (FOI) of 6.82. Economically, this scenario required a total cost of $574,576.47 and achieved a pay-out time (POT) of 48 days, with a net present value (NPV) of $3,534,073.21 after one year. This research highlights the technical and economic advantages of hydraulic fracturing in maximizing well productivity. It provides a detailed recommendation for future stimulation activities in Well X, emphasizing the balance between production enhancement and cost efficiency.