Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society
Aswin Aswin
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Education Mathematics Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching

 1 
Praxeological Analysis of Mathematics Textbooks for Class XI High School Students on Arithmetic and Geometric Sequences Siagian, Qania Agustika; Aswin, Aswin; Herman, Tatang
EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching Vol 12, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Jurusan Tadris Matematika IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13289

Abstract

This study aims to analyze one of the mathematics textbooks published by the Ministry of Education and Culture. Then, the researcher will provide recommendations regarding the presentation of easy-to-understand material based on analysis of techniques, technology, and theory on each problem given by students' mathematics textbooks. This type of research is qualitative with a didactic anthropological theory approach, especially in praxeology. Data collection techniques in the library by reading, recording and processing these sources as research material. Researchers choose books based on the criteria needed to obtain relevant data. These criteria include (1) there is a problem in presenting mathematical material, (2) there is an author's name, and (3) publications from the Ministry of Education and Culture. The researcher found problems in the 2017 revised edition of class XI students' mathematics textbooks finding formulas and examples of arithmetic and geometric sequences. The study results showed several problems presenting the material for arithmetic and geometric sequences, which would raise student learning barriers. The identified Learning barriers are ontogenic, epistemological, and didactical obstacles. With these obstacles, the researcher provides alternative designs which are expected to minimize the occurrence of student learning barriers. So that the design alternatives provided can reduce obstacles for students in thinking and understanding the material of arithmetic and geometric sequences
Mathematical Computational Thinking : Systematic Literature Review Ariati, Chelsi; Aswin, Aswin
EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching Vol 12, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Jurusan Tadris Matematika IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13796

Abstract

One of the key math learning goals that students at school must attain is mathematical computational thinking. This research attempts to review research on mathematical computation thinking done between 2018 and 2023. A systematic review of the literature (SLR) was conducted on all papers listed in Google Scholar, Semantic, and ERIC. The PRISMA protocol served as a guide for the research instrument while the search technique was modified to the selection criteria. The year of publication, education level, research class, demographics, journal indexer, and content studied are the variables in this study. The presentation of all data is quantitative descriptive. The findings of the SLR investigation indicate that in 2022 there will be a large publication of papers about students' mathematical computational thinking. The majority of these studies are conducted in grades VIII and IX in junior high schools. The study of numbers and algebraic concepts was very prevalent in Java and Bali. Future educators and researchers are advised to conduct additional research on computational thinking in mathematics starting at the elementary school level, outside of Java and Bali, on subjects other than algebra and numbers as well as research-related computational thinking indicators.
Co-Authors Ariati, Chelsi Dadan Dasari Dadang Juandi Herman, Tatang Rizky Rosjanuardi Siagian, Qania Agustika Surya Kurniawan Surya Kurniawan Tatang Herman, Tatang