Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.197
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Law Development Journal Sultan Agung Notary Law Review
Umar Ma'ruf
Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (UNISSULA) Semarang
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Law Development Journal

 1 
The Legal Impact of Prejudicial Decisions that State Invalidity of Suspects Determination Iqbal Parikesit; Umar Ma'ruf; Peni Rinda Listyawati
Law Development Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.4.2.%p

Abstract

In judicial practice, there have been several pre-trial decisions declaring the stipulation of a suspect invalid. The impression that arises from the suspect is as if the determination of the suspect is declared invalid, then the case is stopped and not continued. Therefore, this study aims to find out the legal impacts of prejudicial decisions which state the invalidity of the determination of suspects in the current and future laws. This study used a normative legal approach by reviewing and researching primary legal materials consisting of the Legislation on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Judge's Decisions. Then proceed with secondary legal materials in the form of books and journal articles related to pre-trial decisions declaring the determination of the suspect invalid. The analytical technique used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method. The results of the research on the legal impacts of the prejudicial decision stating the invalidity of the determination of the suspect, including (1) The investigation can still be continued even though there has been a pre-trial decision stating the stipulation of the suspect is invalid, (2) If before the determination of the suspect is declared invalid by the pre-trial judge, the suspect has an investigation is carried out by the investigator, the Minutes of Examination or “Minutes of Examination” of the suspect becomes invalid, (3) Legal actions based on the results of the suspect's examination are considered invalid, (4) Legal actions that are not based on the results of the suspect's examination are still valid and (5) If the investigation is continued and the investigator is able to find the suspect, the investigator may re-determine the suspect. Then against the determination of the suspect, the suspect can still apply for a pre-trial again, and so on.
Legal Analysis Of Authority On Military Judges In Judging Of Indonesian National Army (TNI) Sarjono Sarjono; Umar Ma'ruf
Law Development Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2021): June 2021
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (554.134 KB) | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.3.2.371-377

Abstract

This study aims to find answers to three problems. First, because members of the TNI or TNI soldiers who commit general crimes are not tried in civil courts. Second, the authority of the Military Court to try TNI soldiers who commit general crimes after the enactment of Act No. 34 Th. 2004 regarding the TNI. Third, the obstacles/solutions to law enforcement in prosecuting TNI soldiers after the enactment of the TNI Law. This study uses a normative juridical approach, using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that, firstly, TNI members who commit criminal acts are not tried in the Civil Court because there has been no amendment to Act No. 31 of 1997 concerning Military Courts, secondly that after the enactment of Act No.
Co-Authors Achmad Sulchan Ahmad Mufti Damara Anisa Amalia Detkri Badhiron Herman Yusuf Iqbal Parikesit Ira Alia Maerani Peni Rinda Listyawati R. Sugiharto Rizka Rian Ananda Sarjono Sarjono Sri Kusriyah