Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.399
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ekonomi Bisnis EL-MUHASABA Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Global Financial Accounting Journal Jurnal Akuntansi Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan
Suham Cahyono
Universitas Airlangga
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Global Financial Accounting Journal

 1 
What’s Wrong with Lyotard Paradigm? The Repudiation of Generalization and The Diversity of Research Area in Accounting Suham Cahyono; Tjiptohadi Sawarjuwono
Global Financial Accounting Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/gfa.v6i2.6870

Abstract

Purposes - This study aims to investigate the Lyotard paradigm that dominates the framework of research in accounting and finance, especially the concept of generalizing the results of studies that apply a quantitative approach. Research Method - This study is a literature study that uses secondary data from various articles, journals, library books and also Scopus journal articles to provide a lot of evidence related discussion topic. We obtained data for nearly 40 articles from a database of reputable national and international journals indexed by Scopus and Google scholar. Findings - The results of this study show that many scholars alignment with lyotard perspective has been refuted by several axioms and new paradigms that have developed in the midst of the turmoil of research in accounting and finance, so that this has led to various rejections and expansion of studies in accounting and finance, especially studies that use a critical research approach. and postmodernism Implications - The main contribution of this study is to provide a wider literature on research perspectives in accounting and finance, especially for researchers who want an approach that applies an expanded study result. The limitation of this research is that it only considers Lyotard's approach to the generalization paradigm in addition to other approaches such as Derrida and Machiavellianism.
Machiavellian Behavior in Auditor Ethics and Professionalism: Cognitive Moral Development Study Approach Suham Cahyono; Erina Sudaryati
Global Financial Accounting Journal Vol 7 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/gfa.v7i1.7445

Abstract

Purpose - Machiavellianism, which has a negative effect, can undermine the integrity and objectivity of an auditor when inspecting conduct. Those who behave in this way can have an impact on reducing the quality of the auditor's reporting to top management. Therefore, this study aims to review Machiavellian behavior in auditor ethics and professionalism through the Cognitive Moral Development (CMD) approach. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study that comprehensively discusses Machiavellianism in auditors, both in terms of ethics and professionalism, and through the Cognitive Moral Development approach. Previous studies have not examined this relationship. Research Method - The authors utilize research using a conceptual paper (qualitative approach) to reveal how Machiavellian behavior in auditors has been proven accurate by various previous studies. The study also acknowledges CMD studies as a fundamental basis for developing ethics and professionalism in accordance with the criteria for assigning auditors to companies. Findings - The authors have found that a dysfunctional audit process reduces the quality of audit results, which may decrease public confidence in the auditing profession. Therefore, Machiavellian attitudes among auditors can lead to negative consequences, including unethical behavior. To prevent auditors from acting unethically, it is crucial to promote basic values and norms within the auditing profession, especially based on the accountant's code of ethics as a source of ethical guidance for auditors. Implications - This study has significant implications both theoretically and practically in several ways. The theoretical implications of the author's study provide a broad range of literature on the philosophy of accounting and ethics, particularly how to connect Machiavellian behavior with the ethical and professional external auditor code of conduct. From a practical perspective, this study presents significant evidence for the auditor code of ethics in the auditor framework of professional knowledge.
Co-Authors Erina Sudaryati Fitria Andriyani Hendri Arya Fernando Imran Haider Rieswandha Dio Primasatya Sedianingsih, Sedianingsih Sheila Erdika Sri Ningsih Tjiptohadi Sawarjuwono Wendi Wendi