Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer
Rayza Arfian
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer

 1 
Perbandingan Algoritme FIFO, PIE, dan RED terhadap Quality of Service pada Wireless Local Area Network Rayza Arfian; Primantara Hari Trisnawan; Kasyful Amron
Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Februari 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Komputer (FILKOM), Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (640.772 KB)

Abstract

One product of technological advancements in wireless network is Wi-Fi with the IEEE 802.11 standard. Wi-Fi technology can be found in public facilities in the form of a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) and then turned into a public hotspot. A public hotspot surely has limitation either in accomodating a data packet or a number of clients connected. Data packets that are in the queue are generally processed according to the order in which the packets arrives. This can have an effect on Quality of Service. In this research, the implementation of the queue algorithm in the WLAN was carried out to determine its effect on Quality of Service. The queue algorithms are the First-In-First-Out (FIFO) algorithm, Enhanced Proportional Integral Control (PIE), Random Early Detection (RED). The Wi-Fi standard being used is IEEE 802.11b. In Packet Delivery Ratio, the FIFO algorithm provides better results than PIE and RED. FIFO experienced a 0,7% improvement when using 1000 packets as a queue capacity. Then in the End-to-End Delay test, PIE and RED provide an average delay of 0,9 seconds on each test, better than the FIFO algorithm which can reach 5 seconds. Finally, in throughput all the algorithms tested give results that are not far with only 1-2 bps differences.
Co-Authors Kasyful Amron Primantara Hari Trisnawan