Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Civil Engineering Dimension Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil
Andi Andi
Petra Christian University
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : civil engineering dimension

 1 
Project Delivery Method Selection Criteria for Building Projects in Surabaya, Indonesia Andi Andi; Stephanus Eduard Sugianto; Yosep Setiadi Lukas
Civil Engineering Dimension Vol. 26 No. 2 (2024): SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Institute of Research and Community Outreach - Petra Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.9744/ced.26.2.111-119

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate Project Delivery Method (PDM) is a crucial decision for owners that significantly influences the success of a construction project. Various criteria, such as the nature of construction projects and the specific characteristics of owners and projects, should be properly considered to make this decision. This paper first assesses and evaluates the key criteria for selecting a PDM for building projects in Surabaya. It then proposes a multi-criteria decision-making model for the selection of three PDMs, namely Single General Contractor, Multiple Primes, and Design and Build. A three-step questionnaire survey was conducted to achieve the objectives. The initial analysis revealed six important selection criteria, which were then modelled and used in the subsequent survey. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) procedures, the second analysis determined the weights of each criterion for the three PDMs. The paper discusses these weights, suggesting the relative strengths of each PDM. Finally, the paper tests the robustness of the model using three building projects in Surabaya.
A Hybrid Failure Mode and Effects Analysis–Decision Tree Framework for Integrated Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment: A Case in Military Building Construction Lendra Lendra; Norhaliza Qammatasya; Dewantoro Dewantoro; Andi Andi
Civil Engineering Dimension Vol. 28 No. 2 (2026): SEPTEMBER 2026
Publisher : Institute of Research and Community Outreach - Petra Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.9744/ced.28.2.204-218

Abstract

Occupational health and safety in military construction projects face unique challenges due to security restrictions that complicate safety oversight and limit emergency response capabilities. While Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) effectively identifies construction risks, it lacks structured decision-making for selecting optimal mitigation strategies. Existing frameworks focus on risk identification but provide limited guidance for cost-effective mitigation under resource and security constraints. This study develops the first integrated FMEA-Decision Tree framework specifically adapted for military construction environments, demonstrated through the Military Command Building A project. Six experienced stakeholders evaluated 28 construction activities, identifying six dominant risks with Risk Priority Number (RPN) values exceeding 150. The integrated methodology achieved significant RPN reductions ranging from 53.58 to 80.83 points, transitioning all critical risks from "Very High" to "High" categories. External validation through Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Determining Control (HIRADC) confirmed consistent hazard identification. This pioneering approach demonstrates considerable potential for improving safety management in high-security construction contexts.
Co-Authors Andre Wijaya Dewantoro Dewantoro Evan Evan Jani Rahardjo Lendra Lendra Lie Arijanto Norhaliza Qammatasya Stanley Filberto Ciasie Suteja Stephanus Eduard Sugianto Yosep Setiadi Lukas