Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.431
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Ninuk Wijiningsih
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

 1 
PERBANDINGAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA DAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE DI AMERIKA SERIKAT DALAM MELAKSANAKAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI: Comparison of the Indonesian People's Consultative Assembly and the House of Representatives in the United States in performing legislative functions Mutiara Rachmania; Ninuk Wijiningsih
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19579

Abstract

The House of Representatives based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has a role as a law-drafting body (legislation). The existence of people's representative institutions in this democratic country is needed to keep people's power from being abused. As a democracy, the United States also has a legislative institution. The bodies that hold legislative functions in the United States constitution are the Senate and the House of Representatives.  The problem of this research is to analyze the similarities and differences in the function of legislation owned by the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia and the House of Representatives in the United States This research uses normative legal research methods with descriptive sifay to analyze secondary data, which is then used to draw conclusions through deductive methods. The result of this study is the similarity in the function of legislation, these two institutions both have the function to draft and approve draft laws. The difference in the legislative function of the two is that the DPR has several stages in drafting and approving laws.
KEWENANGAN GUBERNUR DKI JAKARTA TENTANG PERUBAHAN NAMA JALAN WILAYAH DKI JAKARTA DITINJAU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TETANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAH : The authority of the Governor of DKI Jakarta regarding the change of street names in the DKI Jakarta area, as reviewed based on Law Number 30 of 2014 regarding Administration Clarissa Alya Alifia Vendra; Ninuk Wijiningsih
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19595

Abstract

The authority of the Governor of DKI Jakarta regarding Determination of Street Names in 2022, is the basis for changing 22 street names in the DKI Jakarta area. This then gave rise to pros and cons in the community, including members of the DPRD DKI Jakarta legislature. The purpose of this study is to describe the preparation and legal consequences of DKI Jakarta Governor's Decree Number 565/2022 concerning changes to street names in the DKI Jakarta area. This study uses a juridical method, is descriptive in nature, and uses secondary data by using qualitative data analysis and drawing conclusions deductively. Based on the results of the analysis, the results obtained are that if it is connected with the Governor of DKI Jakarta Regulation Regarding the Procedure for Preparing Regional Legal Products, then the Decree of the Governor of DKI Jakarta Number 565/2022 is in accordance with the procedure for preparing regional legal products. With the emergence of DKI Jakarta Governor Decree Number 565/2022, it has legal consequences for several parties affected by this decision. When compiling programs or discourses related to changing the names of several roads in the DKI Jakarta area, they are still based on several legal bases that are related not only to looking at one or two legal regulations but also looking at other legal bases in a more objective and widespread manner.
PERBANDINGAN PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN DALAM MASA JABATAN DI INDONESIA DAN BRASIL: Comparison of Presidential Terminations in Terms Occupations in Indonesian and Brazil Farhan Tulus Pratama; Ninuk Wijiningsih
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19795

Abstract

The president is the head of government and head of state in Indonesia and Brazil. During the course of their administration, there are dynamics that each president in both countries experiences, and some have even been forced to resign before the end of their term. Both countries have their own mechanisms for removing a president from office, which leads to the research question: How similar and different are the processes for removing a president in Indonesia and Brazil? Additionally, were the procedures followed in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations during the president's term in both countries? This study uses a comparative normative method with a descriptive nature. Secondary data used in this study include legislation, journals and related books, as well as the Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian language dictionary) and legal dictionaries. The researcher drew several conclusions from this study: (1) The mechanisms for removing a president in Indonesia and Brazil have similarities and differences. (2) There is consistency in the removal of President Abdurrahman Wahid and Ir. Soekarno, but inconsistency in the case of Fernando.
Co-Authors Amita Fayzia Handyani Clarissa Alya Alifia Vendra Dimas Agung Sugeng Hariyadi Farhan Tulus Pratama Mutiara Rachmania Salsa Yaumil Akbari Yoga Adam Pratama