Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Problematika Hukum
Oktavia Ajeng Kartika Dewi
PRESIDENT UNIVERSITY
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Problematika Hukum

 1 
INTERNATIONAL AND REGIONAL ORGANIZATION: ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR ROLES IN MARITIME DELIMITATION OF THE INDIAN OCEAN Oktavia Ajeng Kartika Dewi
Problematika Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v7i2.5176

Abstract

Freedom of opinion, especially on social media, is currently widely misunderstood and misused by society, because the exercise of the right to freedom of expression is a matter of society many people commit acts that turn into insults, accusations without evidence, or evidence defamation that causes harm to certain individuals. Problems in research include how the law regulates crimes and violations of the abuse of the right to freedom of opinion on social media and what criminal sanctions are for criminal acts of defamation under the guise of freedom of expression. Method used In preparing this article, the author used a qualitative approach by looking at it from a normative juridical perspective. This law research is based on legal principles, legal systematics, and legal synchronization both horizontally and vertically. This data collection was obtained from previous journal/paper references. This research concludes that freedom of Opinion is not absolute freedom, but opinion must be appropriate to ethics and norms in society and by legal regulations without harming parties.Keywords: Criminal acts; Defamation; Freedom of expression
INDONESIA'S URGENT NEED TO JOIN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (AMID HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS CONTEXT). Oktavia Ajeng Kartika Dewi; Felicia Miyuki Luntungan; Petra Novita; Aisyah Zafira Usman; Najwa Khalilatur Rahmah
Problematika Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v7i2.5173

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out the tendencies of the ICC from the perspective of Rome 1998. Using normative juridical research methods. International Criminal Court (ICC) permanent independent and international tribunal to try the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression, such as the four major international crimes of a host is humanism generis character. Humanitarian crimes, war crimes, genocide, and aggression constitute a serious violation of rights Human rights (HAM). The crime is classified as the most serious offense seriously so always pay attention internationally. There is an international focus on this practice gross violation of human rights does not matter the world is tamed with practice Human rights are harsh. Unfortunately, so far, there have been many perpetrators of gross human rights violations that cannot be tried in the country where crime is earned (Locus Delicti). In general, the perpetrators of gross human rights violations a real person donation regimes tend to do its author protection. Another reason is that the perpetrators have not or have not been tried Serious crime is a legal system that in the country where the crime occurred it's not enough to fight fair trial of the author. Indonesia will get many benefits by becoming a member country and by incorporating into national law the provisions of the Rome Statute by Indonesia.Keywords: Rome statute, human rights, Indonesia, ICC
Co-Authors Aisyah Zafira Usman Felicia Miyuki Luntungan Najwa Khalilatur Rahmah Petra Novita