Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Agregate
Saleh, La Mohammat
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Transportation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Agregate

 1 
ANALISA PENGENDALIAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU PELAKSANAAN PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN RUANG KELAS BARU MIN 5 MALUKU TENGAH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE NILAI HASIL Cici Amanda Latuconsina; Saleh, La Mohammat; Gasperz, Willem
Journal Agregate Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Maret
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31959/ja.v3i1.2152

Abstract

In project implementation, there is often project completion that is not under planning both in terms of cost and time, so to overcome it requires good project management in the form of cost control and good implementation time in order to help the implementation as planned. in the MIN 5 Central Maluku New Classroom Construction Project located in Tulehu Village, Salahutu District, Central Maluku Regency which has a budget of Rp. 2,891,000,000.00 with a planned implementation time of 120 calendar days from June to October 2022 but the realization of the project is late and completed in 161 calendar days. To overcome these problems, the author uses the Result Value method.The Earned Value method is a control method used to control project costs and time in an integrated manner. Project time or schedule control is a process of monitoring the status of project activities to determine the progress or progress of the project. While project cost control is a process of monitoring the status of project costs to find out project costs at the time of the project.From the results of the analysis in the 3rd month, the value of the cost variance (CV) shows the number (-), which means that the cost of project expenses is greater than the budget. While the value (SV) of the schedule variant shows (-), which means the work is carried out later than the work. However, the evaluation in the 4th month seen from the value of the cost variance (CV) shows a number (+), which means that the cost of expenses is smaller than the budget (Rp.2,891,000,000,00) with the actual cost (ACWP) of the 4th month of (Rp.1,775,028,092.00). The profit obtained by the contractor amounted to (Rp.174,661,809). And the time required to complete the project is 5.53 months.
ANALISA PENGENDALIAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU PELAKSANAAN PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN RUANG KELAS BARU MIN 5 MALUKU TENGAH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE NILAI HASIL Cici Amanda Latuconsina; Saleh, La Mohammat; Gasperz, Willem
Journal Agregate Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Maret
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31959/ja.v3i1.2152

Abstract

In project implementation, there is often project completion that is not under planning both in terms of cost and time, so to overcome it requires good project management in the form of cost control and good implementation time in order to help the implementation as planned. in the MIN 5 Central Maluku New Classroom Construction Project located in Tulehu Village, Salahutu District, Central Maluku Regency which has a budget of Rp. 2,891,000,000.00 with a planned implementation time of 120 calendar days from June to October 2022 but the realization of the project is late and completed in 161 calendar days. To overcome these problems, the author uses the Result Value method.The Earned Value method is a control method used to control project costs and time in an integrated manner. Project time or schedule control is a process of monitoring the status of project activities to determine the progress or progress of the project. While project cost control is a process of monitoring the status of project costs to find out project costs at the time of the project.From the results of the analysis in the 3rd month, the value of the cost variance (CV) shows the number (-), which means that the cost of project expenses is greater than the budget. While the value (SV) of the schedule variant shows (-), which means the work is carried out later than the work. However, the evaluation in the 4th month seen from the value of the cost variance (CV) shows a number (+), which means that the cost of expenses is smaller than the budget (Rp.2,891,000,000,00) with the actual cost (ACWP) of the 4th month of (Rp.1,775,028,092.00). The profit obtained by the contractor amounted to (Rp.174,661,809). And the time required to complete the project is 5.53 months.
ANALISA FAKTOR PENYEBAB DAN AKIBAT PERUBAHAN KONTRAK PEKERJAAN (CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER) PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG INSTALASI RAWAT INAP 2 RSUD MAREN Hi. NOHO RENUAT KOTA TUA Lestaluhu, Damayanti; Saleh, La Mohammat; Titaley, Henriette Dorothy
Journal Agregate Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): September
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31959/ja.v3i2.2359

Abstract

Construction projects often encounter problems such as changes occurring during implementation. These changes may occur in the early, middle, or late stages of the project. Hanna AS (2002) defines a change or change order (CO) in a construction project as an event leading to a change. In this study, the author uses the SmartPLS 4.0 application for data analysis techniques. SmartPLS 4.0 has an outer model/measurement model and an inner model/structural model to test the degree of validity and reliability of the indicators of the variables used in the study and also to determine the impact of relationships between each variable used in the study. Loading factor values for each indicator exceeded 0.6 and AVE values for each variable exceeded 0.5 in the convergence validity test of this study. For the discriminant validity tests, the cross-loading score and the Fornell-Larcker score meet the SmartPLS 4.0 requirements, and the HTMT score for each variable is less than 0.9. The R² test (r-squared) gave an R² value of ≥ 0.75 (75%). On the other hand, the path coefficient test yields a significance value (P-value) for the effect between variables of 0.05 or less for an alpha value of 5%. It can be said that the variables used in this study are valid and there are strong relationships between the test variables.
Co-Authors Cici Amanda Latuconsina Gasperz, Willem Lestaluhu, Damayanti Titaley, Henriette Dorothy