Khairul Saleh L. Tobing
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BETWEEN SHARIA AND CONVENTIONAL INSURANCE IN INDONESIA Asyari; Khairul Saleh L. Tobing; Syamsudin; Kumba Digdowiseiso
International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): December
Publisher : CV. Radja Publika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijebas.v3i6.1310

Abstract

Participating in insurance can help mitigate the risks that arise in life, such as the consequences of unforeseen losses on one's health or property ownership. There are two categories of insurance that are distinguished by their underlying principles: conventional insurance and sharia-compliant insurance. The fundamental concept behind the utilization of traditional insurance involves a transactional approach, necessitating compliance with a financial accounting standard known as PSAK. Hence, the objective of this study is to analyze the contrast between the implementation of financial accounting standards in sharia and conventional insurance. The employed approach is a systematic literature review that relies on scientific literature data. The data collection process involves three stages: identification, screening, and inclusion. The PSAK commonly utilized by sharia insurance companies comprises PSAK 108, 101, and 105. Moreover, the commonly employed PSAK (Indonesian Financial Accounting Standards) in the context of traditional insurance encompasses PSAK 28, 36, and 62. The application of PSAK has a significant impact on both sharia and conventional insurance by enhancing the acknowledgment and examination of an accounting report. In addition, PSAK facilitates the assessment of the effectiveness of insurance implementation in relation to the fundamental principles upon which the company is established.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARIA AUDIT IN INDONESIA: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW Khairul Saleh L. Tobing; Syamsudin; Muhammad Nur; Kumba Digdowiseiso
International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): December
Publisher : CV. Radja Publika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijebas.v3i6.1329

Abstract

Through a literature study, this study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to investigate the implementation of sharia auditing in Indonesia. The primary goal of the study is to comprehend the impact of financial report accessibility on regional financial management accountability in the context of sharia audits. Identifying related journals entails identifying ten accredited national journals that are relevant to the research topic. According to research data, only 17.54% of total Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in Indonesia use Sharia as a basis for audits. A significant issue in sharia audit practices is a lack of auditor expertise and understanding of sharia principles. The sharia audit process is also inefficient, negatively impacting the level of sharia compliance. Recommendations include increasing auditor competency and optimizing the sharia audit process. Furthermore, the implementation of sharia audits in sharia financial institutions faces the complexities of global modernity. Contemporary Islamic thought with Maqashid Syariah is expected to respond to this challenge and spur product innovation. Creating a consistent Sharia audit framework necessitates international collaboration.
THE DETERMINANTS OF VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE IN INDONESIA: A LITERATURE STUDY Syamsudin; Khairul Saleh L. Tobing; Ria; Kumba Digdowiseiso
International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): December
Publisher : CV. Radja Publika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijebas.v3i6.1331

Abstract

This study focuses on the exploration of voluntary disclosure, which refers to the practice of companies willingly sharing financial information with stakeholders. Scholars conducted a comprehensive analysis of existing literature to identify the main factors that affect this voluntary sharing of information. Four crucial factors have been identified as major catalysts for voluntary disclosure. Firstly, the size of a company is a significant factor, as larger companies are more likely to engage in extensive disclosure due to their ample resources and the need for transparency, particularly in complex business operations. Secondly, the importance of profitability cannot be overstated, as companies that are profitable are more likely to reveal information in order to enhance their reputation and build trust with investors and creditors. Thirdly, the degree of leverage, which indicates the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds, can discourage the voluntary release of information. This is because high leverage increases financial risk, leading to a more cautious attitude towards disclosure. Lastly, the ownership structure has the ability to influence the disclosure practices. Companies that have family ownership or majority shareholders who prioritize privacy typically tend to refrain from engaging in extensive voluntary disclosure. Gaining insight into these factors is crucial, as they provide clarity on the reasons behind companies' disclosure strategies, addressing the requirements and anticipations of different stakeholders while managing the intricacies of financial openness.