Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra (KABASTRA)
Safitri, Rizki Dian
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra (KABASTRA)

 1 
Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik Safitri, Rizki Dian; Mulyani, Mimi; Farikah
Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra (KABASTRA) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra (KABASTRA)
Publisher : UPA Bahasa Universitas Tidar And HISKI Kedu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (354.425 KB) | DOI: 10.31002/kabastra.v1i1.7

Abstract

This article explains the theory of speech acts proposed by John L. Austin and his student John R. Searle. Speech act theory is a sub-field of pragmatics. This field of study deals with the ways in which words can be used not only to present information but also to carry out actions. This theory considers three levels or components of speech: locutionary acts (the making of a meaningful statement, saying something that a hearer understands), illocutionary acts (saying something with a purpose, such as to inform), and perlocutionary acts (saying something that causes someone to act). Many view speech acts as the central units of communication, with phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of an utterance serving as ways of identifying the meaning of a speaker’s utterance or illocutionary force. There are five types of Illocutionary points according to Searle: declarations, assertives, expressives, directives, and commissives (1979:viii). A speech act, in order to be successful, needs to be performed along with certain types of conditions. These conditions were categorized by the linguist John Searle, who introduced the term felicity conditions: propositional content condition, preparatory condition, sincerity condition, and essential condition.
Teori Tindak Tutur dalam Studi Pragmatik Safitri, Rizki Dian; Mulyani, Mimi; Farikah
Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra (KABASTRA) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra (KABASTRA)
Publisher : UPA Bahasa Universitas Tidar And HISKI Kedu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31002/kabastra.v1i1.7

Abstract

This article explains the theory of speech acts proposed by John L. Austin and his student John R. Searle. Speech act theory is a sub-field of pragmatics. This field of study deals with the ways in which words can be used not only to present information but also to carry out actions. This theory considers three levels or components of speech: locutionary acts (the making of a meaningful statement, saying something that a hearer understands), illocutionary acts (saying something with a purpose, such as to inform), and perlocutionary acts (saying something that causes someone to act). Many view speech acts as the central units of communication, with phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of an utterance serving as ways of identifying the meaning of a speaker’s utterance or illocutionary force. There are five types of Illocutionary points according to Searle: declarations, assertives, expressives, directives, and commissives (1979:viii). A speech act, in order to be successful, needs to be performed along with certain types of conditions. These conditions were categorized by the linguist John Searle, who introduced the term felicity conditions: propositional content condition, preparatory condition, sincerity condition, and essential condition.
Co-Authors Farikah Mimi Mulyani