Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
mohammad jouhar robby
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum

 1 
Analysis of Law Enforcement Through the Establishment of Jampidmil in Handling Military Judicial Connectivity Cases mohammad jouhar robby
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5814

Abstract

The formation of JAMPIDMIL itself is expected to have firm steps in law enforcement, especially in the scope of prosecution coordination carried out in Handling cases on connectivity. This study aims to determine the existence of the Deputy Attorney General for Military Crimes in handling connectivity cases and to determine the legal consequences of the position of the Attorney General in handling connectivity cases based on Article 35 Paragraph (1) letter g of Law Number 11 of 2021. The theory used as an analytical tool in this study is the theory of authority and the theory of law enforcement. The research method used is normative legal research with the approach used being the statutory approach. The results of the study show that 1) the existence of the Deputy Attorney General for Military Crimes in handling connectivity cases forms an impetus in implementing the accountability of each institution without emphasizing the obligations of one over the other. 2) The legal consequences of the Attorney General's position in handling connectivity cases based on Article 35 Paragraph (1) letter g of Law Number 11 of 2021 delegates the authority to prosecute to the Public Prosecutor in the scope of general courts and the Auditor in the scope of military courts. In practice, resolving connectivity cases often poses challenges if carried out separately, which can lead to dualism in prosecution policies and disparities in sentencing.
Co-Authors