Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Building of Informatics, Technology and Science
Pratama, Miko Septa
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Building of Informatics, Technology and Science

 1 
Machine Learning Comparative Analysis of SVR Method with RBF Kernel and Random Forest for Bitcoin Price Prediction Pratama, Miko Septa; Sulistiani, Heni
Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS) Vol 7 No 4 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/bits.v7i4.9348

Abstract

This study aims to determine how accurate machine learning predictions are for predicting Bitcoin prices using the SVR With RBF Kernel and Random Forest methods. This study was conducted because Bitcoin’s volatility is so high that it is difficult to predict. Therefore, this study uses two different methods to allow for a more objective evaluation of model characteristics on volatile data. The dataset was obtained through Kaggle with a Bitcoin price dataset from 2018 to October 2025, totaling 2,856 datasets in CSV format. After training both methods on the same dataset, price prediction results were obtained. Support Vector Regression (SVR) With RBF Kernel achieved a relatively high data evaluation result with an MAE of 10866.882878735294, MSE of 204836847.5591309, and RMSE of 14312.12239883138, while the Random Forest method achieved a low data evaluation result with an MAE of 19342.47, MSE of 659671833.13, and RMSE of 25684.08. The result of these two methods show a significant difference, with Random Forest more closely aligning with the acual data, with a lower evaluation value and producing values closer to the actual data. This research was conducted to determine the accuracy of the Support Vector Regression (SVR) with RBF Kernel and Random Forest algorithms. It is concluded that both methods make good predictions, only the Random Forest method is closer to the actual Bitcoin price.
Co-Authors Heni Sulistiani