<![CDATA[ The result of this research shows that the case of serious mistake did by worker/laborer in Thailindo Bara Pratama Corporation has gone through bipartite, mediation and conciliation processes. However, all three of them did not reach an agreement and Thailindo Bara Pratama Corporation filed a lawsuit against the worker/laborer to the Industrial Relations Court. Palangkaraya Industrial Relations Court’s Verdict Number 04/G/2012/PHI.PN.PL.R decides that the workers have committed a serious mistake and are subjected to termination of employment but the employer still has to pay their deferred obligation to the worker/laborer. Despite the termination of the employment due to the serious mistake requested by the employer to the Industrial Relations Court is granted, but within the verdict, there are still many legal loopholes. Keywords: Employment, Laborer Serious Mistake, PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama Abstrak Dari hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa kasus mengenai kesalahan berat pekerja/buruh di PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama telah melalui proses bipartit, mediasi dan konsiliasi. Namun ketiganya tidak mencapai kesepakatan dan PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Palangkaraya Nomor 04/G/2012/PHI.PN.PL.R menyatakan bahwa pekerja/buruh telah melakukan kesalahan berat dan dijatuhi pemutusan hubungan kerja namun pengusaha tetap harus membayarkan kewajibannya yang tertunda terhadap pekerja/buruh. Meskipun pemutusan hubungan kerja akibat kesalahan berat yang dimintakan penetapannya oleh pengusaha kepada Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial dikabulkan, namun di dalam putusan pengadilan tersebut masih terdapat banyak celah hukum. Kata kunci : Hubungan Kerja, Kesalahan Berat Pekerja PT. Thailindo Bara Pratama ]]>
Copyrights © 2019
