Judge Consideration in Decision No. 92 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN.Tka is not in accordance with the applicable law, because the judge has not been able to properly assess the facts in the trial. In addition, the application of material law by the judges who passed the decision against Defendant I and Defendant II Article 340 of the Criminal Code in Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code is not appropriate, because the elements in the article have not been fulfilled in its entirety. AbstrakPertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan No. 92 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN.Tka tidak sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku, karena hakim belum dapat menilai dengan baik fakta-fakta dalam persidangan. Selain itu, penerapan hukum materiil oleh hakim yang mengeluarkan putusan terhadap Tergugat I dan Tergugat II Pasal 340 KUHP dalam Pasal 55 ayat (1) KUHP tidak tepat, karena unsur-unsur dalam pasal tersebut belum telah terpenuhi secara keseluruhan. Kata kunci: Keputusan; Hakim; Pengadilan;
Copyrights © 2019