<![CDATA[The pro and contra regarding the application of reverse proof in the case of money laundering is still being debated by legal experts, because the reverse proof is not in accordance with the presumption of innocence and there are indications of human rights violations in its application. The text intends to analyze the reverse evidence reformulation in maximizing the examination of money laundering cases with the predicate crime of corruption. In analyzing, the normative juridical method used are the statue approach and comparative approach. The type of legal material used is primary legal material in the form of related legislation, and secondary legal material in the form of books and scientific articles. The reverse verification system adopted by Indonesia has not been able to function effectively as expected. It is necessary to immediately apply alternative evidences proposed and initiated by thinkers in developed countries who base reverse evidence on a balanced probability of principles, which promotes a proportional balance between protecting individual independence on the one hand, and deprivation of the individual's rights over assets his alleged wealth stems from corruption. Keywords: Reverse Proof, Money Laundering, Corruption.]]>
Copyrights © 2018
