The abuse ofnarcoticsinPariamancityisnotonlydoneby publicbutalsoby civil servant.The narcoticscrime are done by civilservantinPariamancityisabuse of narcotics Part Ifor theirselves asmentionedin theLaw Number 35Year 2009 about Narcotics.Forthis action,thePariamanCourtgivespunishmentnamelyasprisoner forone yeartotheaccuses.The problemsinthisstudyare:First,howaboutthe implementationofcriminalsanctionto civilservantwhodoesthenarcoticcriminal law in the cases 109/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Pmn and the cases number:104/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pmn?Second,howthejudge’sconsiderationinapplyingthecriminalsanctiontothecivilservantwhodoesthenarcoticcriminallawinthecases109/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Pmn the cases number: 104/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pmn?This research is legal research with analytical descriptive specifications. The approachusedisanormativejuridicalapproachandsupportedbyanempirical juridicalapproach.Thedatasourcesusedaresecondarydatawithdatacollection techniquesintheformof documentstudiesandfieldstudiesthrough interviews.Then the data is analyzed qualitatively and described indescriptiveanalytical form. Keyword : Criminal, Civil Servant, Narcotics
Copyrights © 2020