<![CDATA[The research problem is when does a doctor can be expressed malpractice ?. The purpose of this study was to determine some criteria that must be met in determining cases of malpractice by doctors in performing profession. The result is that there is a difference between theory and practice. According to the theory to be able to prove the existence of medical malpractice, there are three criteria used are: The requirement for physicians providing care to the patient, presence of a violation of such obligations, The emergence of losses as a result. Meanwhile, according to the practice to be declared malpractice should be four criteria: existence of a relationship between the rights and obligations of doctors and their clients (duty) ?, existence of breach of duty (break of duty), presence of physical loss (damage), There is a causal relationship ( causation), so that all the elements proved; ie elements of duty, break of duty, demage and causation, it was malpractice. The emergence of accountability to civil doctor when can dibutikan their unlawful acts, in the sense that doctors make mistakes / omissions but errors / omissions that cause harm, such as in errors / omissions by doctors cause injury or handicap something limbs even losses, which inflicts death ,]]>
Copyrights © 2012
