<![CDATA[Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan salah satu lembaga negara yang sangat penting keberadaannya di Indonesia. Selain memiliki fungsi untuk menjaga marwah dari konstitusi kita, MK juga sering menjadi penengah dan pemberi solusi. Dengan hadirnya Mahkamah Konstitusi ditengah sistem ketatanegaraan banyak harapan agar MK dengan kharismanya yang epik dapat menyeimbangkan arus hukum dan politik yang terus bergulir bercampur dengan berbagai kepentingan. Namun, harapan tersebut agaknya sedikit berlebihan mengingat kinerja MK yang belum sesuai dengan keinginan rakyat. Mahkamah Konstitusi mengambil peran penting dalam pembangunan hukum, lagi-lagi kita di hantui oleh maraknya oknum Mahkamah Konstitusi yang berwatak korup dan sarat dengan kompromi. Keputusan hukum diluar kewenangannya sehingga kita lihat semakin hari kita semakin sangat jauh dari kata keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan hukum. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dan pembahasan dalam beberapa hal Mahkamah Konstitusi berhasil memberikan putusan yang sesuai dengan kehendak rakyat. Namun dibeberapa hal Mahkamah Konstitusi juga menghasilkan putusan-putusan yang masih sarat dengan kepentingan golongan. Oleh karena itu tugas pokoknya sebagai penjaga marwah konstitusi harus lebih ditigkatkan.Kata Kunci Mahkamah Konstitusi, kewenangan, putusan The Constitutional Court is one of the state institutions that is very important in Indonesia. In addition to having a function to maintain the dignity of our constitution, the Constitutional Court also often mediates and provides solutions. With the presence of the Constitutional Court amid the constitutional system there is much hope that the Constitutional Court with its epic charism can balance the flow of law and politics which continues to revolve mixed with various interests. However, this expectation seems a bit excessive considering the MK's performance that is not in accordance with the wishes of the people. The Constitutional Court has an important role in the development of the law, again we are haunted by the rampant elements of the Constitutional Court who are corrupt and full of compromises. Legal decisions outside of their authority so that we see that our days are getting very far from the words of justice, certainty, and benefit of the law. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion in several respects the Constitutional Court succeeded in giving a decision in accordance with the will of the people. But in some cases the Constitutional Court also produced decisions that were still full of group interests. Therefore, the main task as guardian of the constitution must be increasedKeywords: Constitutional Court, authority, decision]]>
Copyrights © 2019
