<![CDATA[Research findings on the crime of theft based on Fourth paragraph of Article 363. The current passage hardly complies with the Criminal Code's Article 363 paragraph 1 fifth. At the time of the aforementioned crime, which was committed with the participant's assistance rather than using the forged-based key described in Article 100 of the Criminal Code, law enforcement officials were not aware of modern technology. Because perpetrating a theft necessitates entering a specific location that qualifies for inclusion, i.e., a theft that is carried out by two or more people (Decision No. 50/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Jkt.Tim). The method of statistical analysis used to create scientific work in this case is normative statistical analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, data collection through literature studies, and statistical analysis using a qualitative approach so that the author can conclude that. The judge asserts that the 5th article 363 paragraph (1) is incorrect because.]]>
Copyrights © 2022
