WAJAH HUKUM
Vol 6, No 2 (2022): Oktober

Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Syariah di indonesia

Mona Wulandari (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang)
Saifullah Basri (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
14 Oct 2022

Abstract

After the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 093/PUU-X/2012, the quo vadis regarding the dualism of the authority to settle sharia economic disputes has ended. The Religious Courts are legally constitutional as the only institution authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes through litigation. However, this authority is not fully implemented, there are still other sharia economic disputes whose resolution is decided by the Commercial Court within the scope of the General Courts, namely bankruptcy disputes and PKPU (Debt Payment Obligations Suspension) in Islamic financial institutions. So after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 93/PUU-X/2012, the litigation resolution of sharia banking disputes is handled by the Religious Courts, while non-litigation is handled by arbitration and other alternative dispute resolutions. Arbitration in this case is the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS) while other alternative dispute resolutions are resolved through dispute resolution agreements based on good faith.

Copyrights © 2022






Journal Info

Abbrev

wjhkm

Publisher

Subject

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Description

Wajah Hukum ISSN 2598-604X (Online) adalah peer-review jurnal akses terbuka yang bertujuan untuk berbagi dan diskusi mengenai isu dan hasil penelitian yang lagi hangat pada saat ini. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Batanghari Jambi, Wajah Hukum memuat hasil-hasil penelitian, ...