TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENYELENGGARAAN PERUSAHAAN DAERAH AIR MINUM KOTA SURABAYA

Iwan Sumartono (universitas narotama)
Sugeng Irawan Hadi Erfianto (universitas narotama)
Andi Gotama Chandra (universitas narotama)
Candra Wijaya Nitihardjo (universitas narotama)
Rolly Ade Charles Kaawoan (universitas narotama)

HUKUM BISNIS
Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol 6 No 2 2022

In the context of measuring the success of managing regional public companies, it is based on the fulfillment of PDAM performance achievement criteria as regulated in Kepmdagri 47/1999 concerning Guidelines for Performance Assessment of Regional Drinking Water Companies. The success of PDAM implementation is classified into 5 (five) groups, namely a) Very Good, if the performance score is above 75; b.) Good, if the performance score is above 60 to 75; c.) Enough, if you get a performance score above 45 to 60; d.) Less, if the performance score is above 30 to 45; e.) Not Good, if the performance score is less than or equal to 30. Each of the above PDAM success rate classifications is measured based on the achievement of weights on each financial aspect (45 weight), operational (40 weight), and administrative aspect (15 weight). Keywords: PDAM, performance, measure, achievement