<![CDATA[Today’s most common Positioning System applied is the Global Positioning System (GPS). Positioning System is considered accurate when outdoors, but it becomes a problem when indoors making it difficult to read the GPS signal. Many academics are actively working on indoor positioning solutions to address GPS's drawbacks. Because WiFi Access Point signals are frequently employed in multiple studies, they are used as research material. This study compares the classification algorithms KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and C 4.5 to see which algorithm provides more accurate calculations. The fingerprinting method was employed in the process of collecting signal strength data in each room of the Terpadu Laboratory Building at UIN Sunan Kalijaga using 30 rooms and a total dataset of 5,977 data. The data is utilized to run experiments to determine the location using various methods. According to the experimental data, the Random Forest algorithm achieves an accuracy rate of 83%, C4.5 81%, and KNN 80%, while the SVM method achieves the lowest accuracy rate of 57%.]]>
Copyrights © 2023
