JUDGES PERSPECTIVE ON THE THIRD TALAK IMPOSED OUTSIDE OF COURT SESSION

Nur Rofiq (Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tidar)
Ro’fah Setyowati (Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro)
Meydora Cahya Nugrahenti (Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tidar)
Wahyu Prabowo (Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tidar)
Ahmad Asroni (Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia)
Halisma Amili (Faculty of Law, Universitas Pohuwato)
Taufik Setyaudin (Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Hikmah 2)
Musthafa Musthafa (Department of Fiqh and Usul, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya)

Diponegoro Law Review
Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Diponegoro Law Review April 2023

The research aims to analyze the views of the Panel of Judges, Mediator Judges, Positive Law in Indonesia and Islamic Law regarding triple talak outside the Religious Court hearings. The research method uses the research Normative Law-Empirical and the nature of this research is descriptive-analytic. The results of this research, namely the views of the Panel of Judges, Mediator Judges and Positive Law in Indonesia state that triple talak handed down outside the courtroom is invalid according to Law No. 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts and Compilation of Islamic Law Article 117. Meanwhile, according to Law Islam, there are four opinions, namely; First, the one that punishes three divorces imposed at once is three divorces. Second, the opinion condemns that three divorces at the same time only fall one. Third, a detailed opinion, that is a wife who has not had intercourse and has had intercourse with her husband. Three divorces are pronounced simultaneously against a wife who has not had intercourse, then it is divorced one, while divorces against a wife who has been consummated, then it is divorced three. The fourth opinion condemning three divorces at once is not divorced.