A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Manufacturing: Green Manufacturing Practices in Asia

Sri Susilawati Islami (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, 12780 South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)
Mustafa Maulana Pane (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, 12780 South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)
Annisa Ghina Salsabila (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, 12780 South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)
Beatrice Hillary Sinawang (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, 12780 South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)
Ivanna Caroline Tarabu (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, 12780 South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)
Lazuardi Fauzan Primaputra (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sampoerna University, 12780 South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia)

Indonesian Journal of Computing, Engineering, and Design
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): IJoCED

Sustainable manufacturing is a popular topic due to its importance. Green manufacturing practices have been widely applied in Asia. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on sustainable manufacturing practices in Asia, with a particular emphasis on green manufacturing practices. Based on the systematic literature review using VOSViewer software to analyze the content of the published articles, the literature on sustainable manufacturing practices can be classified into three main categories, which are Sustainable manufacturing, Sustainability practices, and Environmental management. Most of the literature related to Green & sustainable science & technology, Environmental Science, Engineering, Manufacturing, Engineering, Environmental, and Environmental Studies that is accounted by 18.84%, 17.39%, 10.41%, 10.41% and 8.70% of the total documents included in the review, respectively.