<![CDATA[During emergency conditions, the process and implementation of procuring goods and services (PBJ) differ significantly from normal circumstances. One key distinction lies in the implementation stage and the allocated budget. There is a significant price disparity, leading to higher hospital spending and impacting their finances. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, two methods were employed for PBJ implementation: e-catalog and direct procurement. These methods adhered to established rules, but the general procurement plan for 2020 had to be modified due to the pandemic. Research conducted at RSD Idaman suggests that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the procurement of goods and services should utilize the direct procurement method and direct appointment as per emergency procedures outlined in the relevant laws and regulations governing the procurement of goods and services. These regulations are detailed in the Government Goods and Services Procurement Policy Institute number 13 of 2018, which explicitly addresses procuring goods and services in emergencies. This approach aims to facilitate monitoring, ensure timely completion, and prevent fraud. Furthermore, the procurement of goods and services should be conducted continuously to guarantee the availability of essential supplies. This ongoing process is crucial in meeting the demands of emergencies. By following these recommendations, hospitals can effectively manage their procurement processes, mitigate price disparities, and ensure a consistent supply of goods and services while upholding transparency and preventing fraudulent practices.]]>
Copyrights © 2023
