<![CDATA[In the context that has captured enough public attention is the discourse about presidential candidates both discoursed by political parties (elites / political party structures), potential candidates, and by various pollsters who have thrown so many survey results to the public. The research model is qualitative, where there will be a lot of data raised and various statements and theories. Research is used to examine the natural condition of objek (Sugiyono. 2009). The results of the study found a pattern of electability tendencies owned by the characters. In the sense of the two periodizations, there are differences in electability and ratings obtained by potential presidential candidates. For ranks 1 and 2, it was concluded that the figures who were strong enough electability were Prabowo Subianto and Ganjar Pranowo. In the middle rank, namely 3, 4, 5 and 6 shows a stagnation where the compilation of survey results both for the January-February period and the March April period places relatively similar figures, namely Anies Baswedan (per. 3), Sandi Uno (per. 4), Ridwan Kamil (per. 5) and Agus H. Yudoyono (per. 6). The name and rank of each figure still do not change when the results of surveys conducted by pollsters are compiled.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
