<![CDATA[This research investigates the appointment of acting regional heads in preparation for the 2024 simultaneous regional head elections from a constitutional law perspective. Given the urgency of the matter, the study delves into various crucial aspects, including the ramifications of the absence of Government Regulations, transparency issues, and the appointment of active TNI and POLRI members as acting regional heads. Key research questions include analyzing the appointment process vis-à-vis constitutional law and assessing the legality of appointing military and police personnel as acting regional heads according to statutory regulations. Conducted as a normative juridical inquiry, the research utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal resources. Methodologically, legal materials are gathered through literature review and processed via inventory, identification, categorization, and systematization, employing a qualitative juridical approach for analysis. The study concludes that while the formal or textual process of appointing acting regional heads aligns with specific legal provisions, it falls short in adhering to fundamental constitutional principles such as the rule of law, democracy, legality, and regional autonomy. Moreover, it highlights deficiencies in transparency, openness, and accountability, essential elements of good governance and state administration. Additionally, the appointment of military and police personnel as acting regional heads is deemed unlawful, violating pertinent laws and a Constitutional Court decision.]]>
Copyrights © 2022
