TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA MENGENAI PENEMPATAN APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA DALAM JABATAN FUNGSIONAL (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA KUPANG NOMOR 22/G/2019/PTUN-KPG)

Lisa Listyarini (Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Gandes Candra Kirana (Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti

The Plaintiffs frequently alter the deadline for filing a lawsuit with the court and the kind of administrative measures. In the form of the Kupang State Administrative Court Decision Number 22/G/2019/PTUN-KPG, both of these were discovered in the research item. Whether or not the plaintiff's administrative efforts were in compliance with the ASN and PERMA Laws is how the issue is formulated. 6 of 2018 pertaining to the Guidelines for the Settlement of Government Administrative Disputes after Making Administrative Efforts and whether judges' activities when they continue to look into lawsuits with a grace period, such as the subject of the research, are in compliance with the Administrative Court Law. The research approach is normative, and literature reviews are qualitatively examined to enable deductive inferences. Based on the research, analysis and conclusion, it is concluded that the plaintiff's administrative efforts are not in compliance with the law and regulations because administrative appeals, not administrative efforts, should be used. Additionally, the judges' decisions to continue reviewing the lawsuit within the allotted time is also not in compliance with administrative court law.