A, THE ANALISIS TERHADAP NILAI KEBARUAN DESAIN INDUSTRI BABYBATHUB BERDASARKAN UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 2000 TENTANG DESAIN INDUSTRI (Studi Putusan Nomor 5/Pdt-Sus/HKI/Desain/2019/PN Sby): ANALISIS TERHADAP NILAI KEBARUAN DESAIN INDUSTRI BABYBATHUB BERDASARKAN UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 2000 TENTANG DESAIN INDUSTRI

Muhammad Danang Puruhita
Aline Gratika Nugraharani

Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti

In Case No. 5/Pdt-Sus/HKI/Desain/2019/PN Sby there was a dispute between the owner of the industrial design certificate that there were parties who objected to the industrial design of the Baby Bathub tub owned by the defendant. The Baby Bathub industrial design is considered a public domain industrial design by the plaintiff. The formulation of the problem in this study is how an industrial design can be said to be a novelty value whether the consideration of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights in granting the application for registration of the Baby Bathub Industrial Design is in accordance with Law No. 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design. This research method is normative research with descriptive research nature, using primary and secondary data. by using qualitative analysis accompanied by data conclusions using deductive logic. The results of the research show that adianta tanudirjo as the defendant is considered innocent and does not violate Law No. 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design. The conclusion of disputes regarding the novelty value of industrial design Bathtub owned by adianta tanudirjo is not an industrial design owned by the public (Public Domain) but already has the value of novelty (Novelty).