Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance Andalas
Vol 3 No 1 (2020)

Analisis Perbandingan Prediksi Kebangkrutan Perbankan Syariah dan Konvensional di Indonesia

Muhammad Ichsan Adnan (Unknown)
Heru Fahlevi (Universitas Syiah Kuala)



Article Info

Publish Date
05 Oct 2020

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of Islamic and conventional banking in Indonesia by measuring financial distress/ bankruptcy predictions through the Altman Z-Score and Grover G-Score methods for a period from 2016 to 2018. The study evaluated 11 Islamic banks and 40 conventional banks by using Independent Sample T-Test. The results in this study indicated a difference between Islamic and conventional banking based on the Altman Z-Score and Grover G-Score methods. Calculations based on the Altman Z-Score method on Islamic banks indicated that there were 2 banks that were not bankrupt, 1 bankrupt and 11 banks were in the grey zone. Whereas in conventional banks there were 2 banks that were predicted not to go bankrupt, 25 banks that were in the grey area, and 13 banks were predicted to go bankrupt. Based on the Grover G-Score calculation, there were no bankrupt banks, both Islamic banks and conventional banks. The study showed that Islamic banks were more stable than conventional banks.

Copyrights © 2020






Journal Info

Abbrev

jaga

Publisher

Subject

Social Sciences Other

Description

Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance Andalas (JAGA) merupakan media publikasi untuk tulisan asli yang belum pernah diterbitkan di dalam jurnal ilmiah nasional maupun internasional, dan berkaitan dengan bidang akuntansi dan governance. JAGA menerima naskah dalam bentuk hasil penelitian (artikel ilmiah) ...