DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AMONG “ de Jure “ and “ defacto “ HOLDERS IN LOCATION OF LAND CONSOLIDATION PROGRAMME IN MATARAM

Harisandi, Lalu

Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Vol 3, No 8 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

One of the flagship programs Mataram city government is to consolidate land or land consolidation (LC) in the District Urban Village Karang Pule Ampenan  and now known as District of Sekarbela Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara province, but a lot of barriers in the implementation of the LC in particular that in respect of disputes between right holders “de jure” with “de facto” on the location of the land consolidation program in the city of Mataram so the need to understand it dispute settlement patterns. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate some of the problems that is what caused the dispute between the holder of the rights de jure with de facto on the location of the land consolidation program in the city of Mataram and how the dispute resolution procedure between the holders of rights with mastery on the location of the land consolidation program in the city of Mataram and how legally enforceable dispute resolution between rights holders with mastery on the location of the land consolidation program in the city of Mataram. In reviewing these problems, the method used is empirical law research . To the implementation stages of land consolidation in the Karang Pule , some dispute arises which is caused by factors judicial and non- judicial . Therefore , in order to accelerate the settlement of land disputes occurring in Indonesia is no exception caused in the execution Consolidation of land , the government issued a Head of BPN Regulation No. 3 Year 2011 on the Management of the Assessment and Management of Land Case. Therefore , the authors concluded that the causes of the Land Consolidation Land Dispute attractions in the region Karang Pule caused two factors namely factor juridical and non - juridical factors which then need to be resolved mechanism as KBPN Regulation No. 3 of 2011 on the Management Assessment and Handling of Cases land and article 6 paragraph ( 7 ) of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution . From this conclusion , the authors suggest Activity Land Consolidation should be disseminated as early as possible and the government has to actually run the mechanism that has been set under the terms of legislation in accordance with KBPN Regulation No. 3 of 2011 and Revive the court reform .Keywords : Dispute, Defacto and Dejure Holders, Land Consolidation