<![CDATA[It should be noted that with the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 85/PUU-XX/2022, the dispute over the determination of the final stage of the election results will be heard, examined and decided by the Constitutional Court, which was previously temporary, but has become permanent because a special electoral judicial body will no longer be established. This creates a polemic that leads to ineffectiveness. So it is interesting to be studied from the aspect of Maslahah Mursalah regarding a policy that can benefit the community and weigh the good or evil. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the study, namely the legal considerations of the judges in deciding Constitutional Court Decision No. 85 / PUU-XX / 2022 concerning the Special Election Judicial Body, are that the phrase "until the establishment of a special judicial body" in Article 157 paragraph (3) of Law No. 10 of 2016 is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and has no binding legal force; further, it is stated that a special court will not be established, but "the case of the dispute over the determination of the final stage of the election results will be examined and decided by the Constitutional Court". and Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 is not in line with the theory of Maslahah Mursalah, considering that a special court is no longer established by transferring the authority to resolve disputes over election results to the Constitutional Court.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
