<![CDATA[The growing number of media trials in Bangladesh is threatening the protection of human rights, especially the right to privacy. This ubiquitous phenomenon intertwines with the fundamental fabric of societal dynamics in this nation. A person's right to privacy is put under threat when they are publicly vilified through the media before their day in court, highlighting the reciprocal nature of media trials and the judicial process. This research critically evaluates the degree to which media trials infringe upon the basic rights of individuals through the use of a qualitative approach. The article explores the intricate relationship between media trials and the fundamental human right to privacy. This analysis rigorously examines the impact of media intrusion on the infringement of individuals' rights to privacy. It also talks about the tricky problem of finding the right balance between protecting the media's valued independence and putting reasonable limits on them, as required by local laws and global policy frameworks. Key findings show that privacy and media freedom are constitutionally protected. The study notes that extensive media trials influence public opinion, throw doubt on justice, and invade privacy. Media freedom and privacy must be balanced in the nation's emerging democracy. The paper suggests setting specific digital media rules, creating a social media regulating agency, and restricting police information sharing during investigations to prevent prejudiced media trials. Journalistic integrity and impartiality must be promoted, and government regulatory authorities should be reinforced to regulate media outlets. In the changing democratic landscape of Bangladesh, this article takes on the difficult job of looking into ways to find a balance between media freedom and the inalienable right to privacy. Keywords: Media trails, right to privacy, Fair trail, Excessive media effects, Legal instruments, Balancing.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
