<![CDATA[Information from brain tumour visualisation using MRI can be used for brain tumour classification. The information can be extracted using different feature extraction techniques. This study compares shape-based feature extraction such as Zernike Moment (ZM), and Pyramid Histogram of Oriented Gradients (PHOG) with texture-based feature extraction such as Local Binary Patterns (LBP), Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) in brain tumour classification. This research aims to find out which feature extraction is better for handling brain tumour images through the accuracy and f1-score produced. This research proposes to combine each feature based on its approach, i.e. ZM+PHOG for shape-based feature extraction and LBP+GLCM+HOG for texture-based feature extraction with default parameters from the library and modified parameters configured based on previous research. The dataset used comes from Kaggle and has three classes: meningioma, glioma, and pituitary. The machine learning classification models used are Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB) and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) with default parameters from the library. The models were evaluated using 10-fold stratified cross-validation. This research resulted in an accuracy and f1-score of 84% for texture-based feature extraction with modified parameters in RF classification. In comparison, shape-based feature extraction resulted in accuracy and f1-score of 70% and 68% with modified parameters in RF classification. From the results, it can be concluded that texture-based feature extraction is better in handling brain tumour images compared to shape-based feature extraction. This study suggests that focusing on texture details in feature extraction can significantly improve classification performance in medical imaging such as brain tumours]]>
Copyrights © 2024
