AbstractSo far, victims have only been seen as the end of one or several acts of terrorism, and have not been maximally involved in the prevention and handling of terrorism. When acts of terrorism occur, victims experience forms of suffering and loss. Physically; died, suffered permanent bodily damage / disability which requires a long healing process or minor injuries. Psychologically; faced with feelings of trauma, closure, unstable emotions and so on. Economically; can no longer support their family, lose their career in work and there are many more losses that must be borne by victims of criminal acts of terrorism. This research uses the normative juridical method which is carried out through literature studies that examine (especially) primary data in the form of laws and regulations, other legal documents, as well as research results, assessment results, and other references. In analyzing the data in this study, qualitative data analysis was used to the data that had been collected. Qualitative data analysis is carried out by thinking based on reasoning to be able to draw logical conclusions. Qualitative data analysis to draw conclusions is not only aimed at revealing the truth, but also aims at understanding the symptoms that arise in the implementation of a legal provision regarding the regulation of the Regulatory Framework for the Protection of Victims of Terrorism. The results of the research show that there are still factors that inhibit the fulfillment of the rights of victims of terrorism, which are oriented towards proving that someone can be considered a victim to propose and get their rights compared to fulfilling the rights of victims where the state must be more proactive and take the initiative in moving victims to fight for their rights so that they can eliminate everything. ineffective and efficient procedures for victims. This is to avoid if the victims are more likely to talk about third parties outside the government who have helped them because the effect of the assistance they receive is more on the victims. It is recommended that in making laws and regulations related to the protection of victims of criminal acts, it must be able to pay attention to and prioritize the approach to the best interests and needs of the victim. It means that the formulation of the related laws and regulations above is still unable to accommodate the rights of other victims as a whole. If it is necessary to change / improve the aforementioned statutory regulations, it must be able to synchronize with other laws and regulations related to victims of terrorism which can be stated in the provisions of articles that are clearly defined and listed so that their relevance and synchronization can be seen.Keywords: regulation, terrorism, victims, protection for terrorist victims
Copyrights © 2020