International Journal of Emerging Issues in Islamic Studies
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): December 2024

A Comparison of Shura and Deliberative Democracy Decision-Making Methods: Similarities and Differences

Neslinebi, Seyfeddin (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
30 Dec 2024

Abstract

Shura is a decision-making model in Islamic governance that aims to make the right decisions for society in general and inclusively. While Allah has established the general framework for various issues, particularly administrative matters, the specific details are left to human discretion, to be determined through Shura and consultation. The significance of Shura is underscored in verse 38 of Surah Ash-Shura, where it is mentioned alongside fundamental Islamic principles such as prayer and zakat. Conversely, the democratic management model, a human construct, has evolved since ancient Greece, undergoing transformations resulting in diverse forms such as direct, representative, liberal, social, radical, dialogic, agonistic, and deliberative democracy. This study aims to compare the principles of Islamic governance with those of deliberative democracy. By analyzing their similarities and differences, this research seeks to evaluate the compatibility of these two governance frameworks. The findings provide insights into their potential alignment or divergence, contributing to a broader understanding of decision-making practices in diverse cultural and philosophical contexts.

Copyrights © 2024






Journal Info

Abbrev

ijeiis

Publisher

Subject

Religion Social Sciences

Description

IJEIIS invites authors interested in Islamic Studies and its relation to share their research, scientific article, and study with broader society and global readers. The result of the research is expected to contribute to the development of the Emerging Issues in Islamic Studies both theoretically ...