Indonesian Journal of Kidney and Hypertension
Vol 1 No 3 (2024): Volume 1 No. 3, December 2024

The Determinants of Detrimental Changes in Pulse Pressure During Maintenance Hemodialysis Treatments

Ratna Damayanti (Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
Iri Kuswadi (Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
Raden Heru Prasanto (Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
Metalia Puspitasari (Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
Yulia Wardhani (Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)
Danny Pratama Kuswadi (Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)



Article Info

Publish Date
24 Dec 2024

Abstract

Background: Studies indicate that large fluctuations in pulse pressure during hemodialysis are associated with cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Objective: We investigated the determinants of detrimental changes in pulse pressure (ΔPP) during hemodialysis. Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted from 1 to 30 April 2023 at Dr. Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta, involving maintenance hemodialysis patients for ≥ 6 months. Patients were categorized into group 1 (detrimental ΔPP, ΔPP >5 mmHg or <−25 mmHg) and group 2 (stable ΔPP, −25 to 5 mmHg). Mann-Whitney, independent-t, chi-square, Fisher exact tests, and logistic regression were applied to evaluate associations between ΔPP groups and clinical variables. Results: This study involved 136 patients, 75 males (55.1%) with a mean age of 52 (18-87). The most common comorbid was hypertension, present in 85 patients (62.5%). The mean hemodialysis vintage of patients was 47.2 (6.5-330.7) months. We found significant difference between group in post-dialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.003), pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p=0.015), post-dialysis DBP (p=0.007), ultrafiltration (p=0.041), pre-dialysis mean-arterial-pressure (MAP) (p=0.013), post-dialysis MAP (p=0.002), and alpha-blocker treatment (p=0.037). Multivariate logistic regression analysis shows a significant association between groups of ΔPP with pre-dialysis DBP (p=0.035; OR=1.153; OR=Exp(10xℬ) =4.137) and post-dialysis SBP (p=0.007; OR=1.052; OR=Exp(10xℬ) =1.6487). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that group 1, with detrimental changes in pulse pressure during hemodialysis, was found to have higher post-dialysis DBP, pre-dialysis DBP, post-dialysis SBP, pre-dialysis MAP, post-dialysis MAP, alpha-blocker treatment, and ultrafiltration, with significant association with post-dialysis SBP and pre-dialysis DBP.

Copyrights © 2024






Journal Info

Abbrev

inakidney

Publisher

Subject

Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Public Health

Description

The primary mission of this journal is to serve as a conduit for the dissemination of both clinical and foundational research pertinent to the expansive domains of nephrology and hypertension. Spanning a diverse array of topics, the journal delves into multifaceted areas including but not limited to ...