<![CDATA[Optimizing hyperparameters is crucial for enhancing the performance of deep learning (DL) models. The process of configuring optimal hyperparameters, known as hyperparameter tuning, can be performed using various methods. Traditional approaches like grid search and random search have significant limitations. In contrast, Bayesian optimization (BO) utilizes a surrogate model and an acquisition function to intelligently navigate the hyperparameter space, aiming to provide deeper insights into performance disparities between naïve and advanced methods. This study evaluates BO's efficacy compared to baseline methods such as random search, manual search, and grid search across multiple DL architectures, including multi-layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and LeNet, applied to the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) and CIFAR-10 datasets. The findings indicate that BO, employing the tree-structured parzen estimator (TPE) search method and expected improvement (EI) acquisition function, surpasses alternative methods in intricate DL architectures such as LeNet and CNN. However, grid search shows superior performance in smaller DL architectures like MLP. This study also adopts a multi-objective (MO) perspective, balancing conflicting performance objectives such as accuracy, F1 score, and model size (parameter count). This MO assessment offers a comprehensive understanding of how these performance metrics interact and influence each other, leading to more informed hyperparameter tuning decisions.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
