<![CDATA[This research discusses the strategy of handling corruption offences without punishment through proactive recovering. This research uses a qualitative approach with a literature review as well as from secondary data which shows that asset recovery has not been implemented effectively. Another factor is the lack of implementation of Indonesian regulations in an effort to prevent, prosecute, and minimise the amount of corruption in Indonesia. This research also discusses the legal analysis of efforts to return assets from corruption abroad and the role of the KPK in handling infrastructure corruption. The results show that the corruption environment faced by the KPK involves the legislative, executive, and private parties who have great power and authority. This research also discusses governance, political structure, and corruption in Indonesia as well as a review of public procurement corruption in Indonesia. The results show that corruption still occurs in areas that have obtained the best opinion and corruption eradication efforts in the first era of President Jokowi are better than the previous period. Therefore, it is important for BPK to think about more substantive good governance in the reporting mechanism so that it can effectively reduce corruption.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
