Religious blasphemy is an act of insulting or demeaning religious beliefs. In such cases, law enforcement must apply the law and take action against violations through both litigation and non-litigation. However, in Decision 365/Pid.Sus/2023/PN IDM, the legal measures were deemed insufficient to create a deterrent effect, as they only imposed criminal responsibility on the perpetrator. To address this, an ultra petita decision is necessary, where the judge imposes a stronger sentence to prevent future offenses. Judge Panji Gumilang, in handling a similar case, can refer to the jurisprudence from the Ahok blasphemy case as a legal basis, ensuring that the verdict carries a stronger deterrent effect and upholds justice more firmly.
Copyrights © 2025