<![CDATA[This study aims to evaluate user sentiment toward the Liputan6.com application available on the Google Play Store. In the digital era, user reviews serve as a significant indicator in assessing the quality of an application. However, the inconsistency between rating scores and review content renders manual analysis less objective. To address this issue, a machine learning approach was adopted by comparing two algorithms, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naïve Bayes (NB). A total of 2,500 reviews were collected through a web scraping process and automatically labeled based on the rating (positive if ≥ 3, negative if < 3). The data preprocessing stages included cleaning, case folding, tokenizing, stopword removal, and token filtering. Subsequently, word weighting was carried out using the TF-IDF method, followed by classification using 10-Fold Cross Validation in RapidMiner. The evaluation results indicate that, in the positive class, NB demonstrated superior precision (89.47%), whereas SVM achieved higher recall (98.94%) and F1-score (90.96%). In the negative class, SVM performed better in terms of precision (66.15%), while NB attained higher recall (65.65%) and F1-score (36.34%). Further evaluation based on AUC and accuracy positioned SVM in the good category (AUC 0.842; accuracy 83.82%), while NB was categorized as fail (AUC 0.505; accuracy 60.87%). Overall, SVM is considered to be more effective than NB.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
