<![CDATA[In accordance with the regulations set by the Office of Kotasan Village, residents are entitled to receive subsidized food based on specific criteria. To determine who is selected to receive subsidized food and distribute it to low-income families will be conducted by the Kotasan Village Office. As a supporting tool to determine individuals eligible to receive subsidized food, a decision support system is required. Within the decision support system, there are several methods, one of which can be used is the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In this study, the author will address a case to find the best alternative from certain established criteria by comparing the alternatives using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. In this evaluation, the alternative Saidi ranks first with a Vi value of 0.910, followed by Zum in second place with a Vi of 0.820. In third position, Arju has a Vi value of 0.761. Meanwhile, the alternative with the lowest rank is Sri with a Vi of 0.425, followed by Supri with a Vi of 0.433 and Paiman with a Vi of 0.461.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
