This study aims to analyze the differences in the perception of Auditor Finance and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) to application of the forensic audit to detect fraudulent statement. Distinguished by differences in the perception of the scope of work, educational background and work experience.This study used quantitative approach and a comparative study that compared the three samples but has only one independent variable, namely the perception of auditor BPKP to the application of the forensic audit to detect fraudulent statement. This study is an empirical study with purposive sampling techniques in data collection. Data obtained by distributing 105 questionnaires in BPKP East Java. T he hypothesis test used Samples Free Kruskal-Wallis.The results of hypothesis test show that: 1) there is no significant difference in the perception of auditor BPKP based on scope of work, 2) which is based educational background shows that there is no significant difference in the perception of auditor BPKP, 3) while based on the results show the work experience there are differences in the perception of auditor significant BPKP to the adoption of a forensic audit to detect fraudulent statement.
Copyrights © 2013