<![CDATA[Heart disease remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating accurate early detection. This study aims to compare the performance of several Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms in heart disease classification using the Heart Disease dataset with 918 samples. The methods tested included Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Deep Neural Network (DNN). Preprocessing included feature normalization, data splitting (80:20), and simple hyperparameter tuning for parameter-sensitive models. Evaluations were conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, AUC, and confusion matrix analysis to identify error patterns. The results showed that SVM and DNN achieved the highest accuracies of 91.3% and 92.1%, respectively. However, DNN has higher computational costs and risks of overfitting on small datasets. These findings confirm that traditional ML models such as SVM remain highly competitive on tabular medical data.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
