Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)
Vol. 50 No. 4 (2017): December 2017

Effects of filler volume of nanosisal in compressive strength of composite resin

Dwi Aji Nugroho (Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta)
W. Widjijono (Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta)
N. Nuryono (Faculty of Mathemathis and Natural Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta)
Widya Asmara (Faculty of Veterinary, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta)
Wijayanti Dwi Aastuti (Vocational College, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta)
Dana Ardianata (Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta)



Article Info

Publish Date
30 Dec 2017

Abstract

Background: One of the composite resin composition is inorganic filler. The production of inorganic filler materials was highly dependent on non-degradable, and nonrenewable fossil fuels. Therefore, natural fibers can be used as substitute for inorganic fillers. One that can be developed is sisal. Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effects of nanosisal filler volume on compressive strength of composite resin. Methods: In this study, composite resins with nano-sized sisal as filler were manufactured and labeled as nanosisal composites. This research processed sisal fibers into nano size and mixed them with Bis-GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA, Champhorquinone (Sigma Aldrich). Nanofiller composite (Z350 XT, 3M, ESPE) was utilized as a control. The 20 samples utilized were divided into 4 groups (each group containing five samples): Group A contained nanosisal composite of 60% filler volume, group B, nanosisal composite of 65% filler volume, group C, nanosisal composite of 70% filler volume and group D, nanofiller composite (Z350 XT, 3M, ESPE). Samples were 2 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height. The sample was tested for compressive strength using a universal testing machine (UTM). Data was analyzed by means of a Kruskal Wallis procedure. Results: The mean of the compressive strength of the nanosisal composite 60% was 16.80 MPa; the nanosisal composite 65% was 10.80 MPa, the nanosisal composite 70% was 7.20 MPa and the nanofiller composite was 7.40 MPa. There was a significant difference in data analysis (p = 0.033; p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the filler volume of nanosisal influenced the compressive strength of a composite resin and the nanosisal filler volume was recomended at 60%.

Copyrights © 2017






Journal Info

Abbrev

MKG

Publisher

Subject

Dentistry

Description

The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) (e-ISSN:2442-9740; p-ISSN:1978-3728) is published by the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga. Its diciplinary focus is dental science and dental hygiene. The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is published in English on a quarterly ...