BULETIN FISIKA
Vol. 26 No. 1 (2025): BULETIN FISIKA

Comparison of Geoelectric Method with Audio Magnetotelluric Method (ADMT) in Aquifer Position Testing at Udayana University Hospital

Rani Junita Marbun (Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Udayana, Kampus Bukit Jimbaran, Badung, Bali, Indonesia 80361)
I Nengah Simpen (Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Udayana, Kampus Bukit Jimbaran, Badung, Bali, Indonesia 80361)
I Nengah Sandi (Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Udayana, Kampus Bukit Jimbaran, Badung, Bali, Indonesia 80361)
Komang Ngurah Suarbawa (Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Udayana, Kampus Bukit Jimbaran, Badung, Bali, Indonesia 80361)
Ni Nyoman Rupiasih (Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia)
Wayan Gede Suharta (Program Studi Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Udayana, Kampus Bukit Jimbaran, Badung, Bali, Indonesia)



Article Info

Publish Date
28 Feb 2025

Abstract

Groundwater is an important resource for supporting life, including at Udayana University Hospital, which requires a stable supply of clean water. This study aims to compare the Wenner configuration geoelectric method with the Audio Magnetotelluric (ADMT) method in identifying the position of aquifers. Measurements were conducted around the hospital borehole with a track length of 230 m for the geoelectric method and 50 m for the ADMT method. The results showed that with the geoelectric method, the aquifer position was detected at a depth of 30-37 m with a resistivity of 77.5-144 Ωm and with the ADMT method at a depth of 30-38 m with a resistivity of 1-3 Ωm. In terms of time, the ADMT method is superior, with a total time of 50 minutes and the geoelectric method with a total time of 3 hours 20 minutes. From the cost aspect, the geoelectric method is more economical, with a tool cost of around Rp 126,000,000, and the ADMT method with a tool cost of around Rp 205,000,000. The ADMT method is more accurate in detecting the position of aquifers with an accuracy of 96% with a depth range of 100 m, while the accuracy of the geoelectric method is 92% with a depth of 37 m. Based on these results, the ADMT method is recommended for more accurate and efficient groundwater exploration.

Copyrights © 2025






Journal Info

Abbrev

buletinfisika

Publisher

Subject

Astronomy Energy Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Physics

Description

Aims and Scope Aims The Journal aims to promote the theory and application in the field of physics and to encourage a vigorous dialogue among scholars and researchers worldwide. It presents original research articles, letters, and review articles, and publishes the latest achievements and ...