Regional development inequality remains a major challenge in India, given the country’s high level of social, economic, and geographical diversity. Despite sustained national economic growth, the benefits of development have not been evenly distributed across regions, particularly between urban and rural areas. This study aims to analyze the role of development planning strategies in reducing regional development disparities in India. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach using thematic content analysis of policy documents and relevant scholarly literature. The data analyzed are secondary data derived from official government documents, including the Twelfth Five Year Plan and Strategy for New India @75, sectoral ministry reports, academic publications, and reports from international institutions. The findings indicate that the reduction of regional development inequality in India is strongly influenced by an integrated combination of centralized planning and decentralized governance. Centralized planning provides a national strategic framework that prioritizes inclusive growth and equitable resource allocation, ensuring greater attention to underdeveloped regions. At the same time, decentralization through the Panchayati Raj system enhances policy effectiveness by aligning national objectives with local needs and improving community participation in development planning. Furthermore, targeted programs for backward regions, infrastructure development, and the expansion of social services have significantly contributed to improving rural livelihoods, reducing unemployment, and narrowing regional disparities. Infrastructure development, in particular, plays a critical role in enhancing connectivity, lowering transaction costs, and expanding access to economic opportunities. However, the study also finds that disparities persist due to variations in institutional capacity, governance quality, and administrative efficiency across regions. The study concludes that reducing regional development inequality requires not only well-designed planning policies but also effective implementation, strong local institutions, and sustained community engagement.
Copyrights © 2026