<![CDATA[Accurate evaluation of energy production in photovoltaic (PV) systems is critical for renewable projects, especially in tropical climates where environmental factors such as temperature significantly affect performance. Although commercial simulation tools exist (photovoltaic geographic information system (PVGIS), PVsyst, and system advisor model (SAM)), previous studies have identified notable deviations between their predictions and actual data, particularly in tropical climates. Moreover, these investigations are usually limited to short periods (one year) and do not systematically compare multiple tools under interannual conditions. This study evaluates the accuracy of PVGIS, PVsyst, and SAM in predicting the energy production of a PV installation in a tropical equatorial climate for 24 months to identify the most suitable tool for this context. Monthly energy production data were collected from a PV plant in Monteria, Colombia, equipped with 240 modules and two 36 kW inverters. Simulations were performed using the most recent PVGIS, PVsyst, and SAM versions. Accuracy was evaluated using metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). SAM showed the highest accuracy, with an overall RMSE of 1,993.71 kWh and MAE of 1,615.87 kWh, followed by PVGIS (RMSE: 2,076.65 kWh, MAE: 1,830.84 kWh) and PVsyst (RMSE: 3,546.18 kWh, MAE: 3,250.17 kWh). The results highlight that SAM provides estimates closer to the real data and less dispersion than other tools. This study contributes to the renewable energy field by systematically comparing simulation tools in an understudied tropical context. The findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate software according to the specific environmental conditions of the project, thus optimizing the design and efficiency of PV systems in tropical regions.]]>
Copyrights © 2025
