<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the extent to which panic buying fuel during the crisis in West Aceh affected community social solidarity. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Data was collected through primary observation at fuel stations in Meulaboh City, West Aceh, as well as through literature studies from books, scientific journals, research reports, and documents related to energy crises and community social behavior. Data analysis utilized Emile Durkheim's theory of social solidarity. The research findings indicate that panic buying behavior of fuel caused the weakening of mechanical social solidarity due to the emergence of individualistic attitudes, distrust, and competition among residents. However, on the other hand, this crisis also fostered organic solidarity through cooperation and mutual assistance among residents in obtaining fuel and seeking collective solutions. Fuel scarcity can be addressed through various means, one of which is through the optimization of Village Funds. Sustainable Community Empowerment can serve as a solution through sustainable alternative energy, particularly by utilizing plastic pyrolysis technology. This technology offers a dual solution: reducing dependence on subsidized fuel (such as diesel and Pertalite) while effectively addressing the plastic waste problem that pollutes the environment. In West Aceh, village funds can be used to establish small-scale pyrolysis facilities that will convert local plastic waste into fuel oil, gas, and carbon black, all of which have economic value. This approach not only enhances community energy independence and creates new business opportunities but also aligns with coastal community economic empowerment programs and green technology-based waste management. The successful implementation of plastic pyrolysis technology as a long-term solution depends heavily on three main pillars. First, Education and Training for the community to ensure proper technology management. Second, Infrastructure and Funding utilize village funds to establish communally managed facilities. Third, Socialization and Government Support from local to central levels to encourage adoption and project sustainability. By optimizing village funds for pyrolysis projects, communities can achieve energy independence, reduce the government's subsidy burden, and significantly improve environmental conditions from plastic waste pollution.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
